
Pellet vs Gel Hormone Delivery – Pros, Cons & Comparison | Hurricane WV
Introduction
Selecting the right delivery method for bioidentical hormone therapy is crucial to achieving stable hormone levels, high compliance and minimal side effects. In Hurricane, WV, patients often ask whether hormone pellets or topical gels are better. Both deliver hormones through the skin, but they differ in dosing schedules, absorption patterns and convenience. This guide compares pellets and gels, drawing on research and our clinical experience.
Overview of Gel Therapy

Testosterone or estrogen gels are applied daily to clean, dry skin—often on the shoulders, upper arms or thighs. The hormones absorb through the skin into the bloodstream.
Pros include:
Non‑invasive: No procedure required; easy to start or stop.
Adjustable: Dose can be titrated by changing the amount applied; if side effects occur, you can stop or reduce the dose.
Widely available and FDA‑approved: Several branded products (e.g., AndroGel, EstroGel) are regulated, ensuring consistent dosing.
Cons include:
Daily application: Requires adherence; missing doses leads to symptom fluctuations.
Absorption variability: Skin differences, sweat, lotions and humidity can affect absorption. Hot, humid summers in West Virginia may cause gels to run or wipe off, reducing efficacy.
Risk of transfer: Hormones can transfer to partners, children or pets through skin contact until fully absorbed; caution needed.
Skin irritation: Some users experience rashes or itching at the application site.
Overview of Pellet Therapy
As detailed earlier, pellets are small cylinders of compressed hormone inserted under the skin, typically in the hip or buttock. They dissolve slowly over 3–6 months, releasing hormones steadily.
Pros include:
Long‑term convenience: Only three to four insertions per year; no daily routine.
Steady levels: Pellets provide a consistent dose, avoiding daily peaks and troughs; may reduce mood swings and fatigue.
High compliance: A retrospective study reported continuation rates of 93 % and complication rates below 1 %.
No risk of transfer: Since the hormone is internal, there’s no risk of accidental exposure to others.
Cons include:
Minor surgical procedure: Requires a small incision and local anaesthetic; risk of infection or extrusion.
Non‑adjustable: Once inserted, the dose cannot be changed; if you experience side effects, you must wait for the pellet to dissipate.
Cost: Pellets may cost more upfront; insurance coverage varies.
Not FDA‑approved: Most pellets are compounded; quality and purity can vary.
Comparison: Hormone Gels vs. Pellets
When choosing between hormone gels and pellets for therapy, there are several factors to consider:
Dosing Frequency: Gels must be applied daily, while pellets only require insertion every 3–6 months.
Adjustability: Gels are easy to adjust or discontinue quickly. Pellets, however, provide a fixed dose that cannot be changed until the pellet dissolves.
Consistency of Absorption: Gels have variable absorption, which can be affected by skin and environmental factors. Pellets offer a steady release over several months.
Risk of Hormone Transfer: With gels, there is a risk of hormone transfer to others through skin contact until the application area dries. Pellets have no transfer risk.
Procedure Required: Gels require no procedure for use. Pellets require a minor insertion procedure by a healthcare provider.
FDA Approval: Most gel products are FDA-approved, whereas pellets are mostly compounded formulations and often not FDA-approved.
Compliance: Gels may have lower compliance because they require daily application. Pellets have high compliance, with about 93% continuation rates reported.
Cost: Gels are typically covered by insurance, resulting in a manageable monthly expense. Pellets often involve a higher upfront cost and may not be covered.
Ideal For: Gels suit patients wanting flexible dosing or those who prefer to avoid procedures. Pellets are better for busy individuals seeking steady hormone levels without the need for daily application.
Lifestyle & Personal Considerations

When choosing between gel and pellet therapy, consider your daily routine, environment and preferences:
Daily routines: Are you likely to remember a daily application? Travellers or those with hectic schedules may prefer pellets.
Climate: West Virginia summers are humid; sweat may dilute gels, while winter dryness could increase absorption. Pellets are unaffected by climate.
Skin contact: If you frequently hold children or pets, the risk of transfer with gels may be a concern.
Medical comfort: Do you prefer to avoid procedures, or do you want to “set it and forget it”? Some people dislike the idea of implantation; others appreciate not having to think about dosing.
Risks & Safety
Both methods require medical supervision. Gel users should wash hands after application, let the area dry before dressing and avoid skin contact with others for several hours. Monitor for skin irritation. Pellet users must follow wound‑care instructions and limit strenuous gluteal exercise for a few days after insertion. Because pellets are compounded, ask your provider about their compounding pharmacy’s accreditation and quality control. Regardless of method, regular lab monitoring is essential to avoid over‑ or under‑replacement.
Who Might Choose Which?
Pellets may be ideal for: Busy professionals, travellers, those with inconsistent routines, individuals who experience large hormonal fluctuations on gels, and people sensitive to transference risks.
Gels may suit: Individuals preferring flexibility, those trying hormone therapy for the first time, women requiring low doses that may change with time, and patients with budget constraints or good insurance coverage.

Local Services & Next Steps
Our Hurricane clinic offers both pellets and gels for estrogen and testosterone therapy. During your consultation, we review your health history, lifestyle and preferences, explain the pros and cons, and help you make an informed choice. We also guide you through cost estimates, insurance coverage and financing options. Many of our patients combine hormone therapy with 3‑D body scanning, nutrition coaching and exercise programs to maximise benefits. Schedule a visit to discuss which method suits your goals.
Conclusion
There is no universally “better” hormone delivery method—only the one that best fits your lifestyle, health and preferences. Pellets offer long‑term convenience and steady levels but require a procedure and are not adjustable. Gels are non‑invasive and adjustable but require daily discipline and carry a transfer risk. Talk to a knowledgeable provider to evaluate your options. Contact our Hurricane clinic to schedule a personalised hormone consultation and explore the delivery method that works for you.
